Thursday, June 30, 2005
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
The List
Rating: 1 to 5 scale (5 = best, 1 = worst)
- Hitch :3: I thought Fresh Prince did a pretty good job considering the story line. I could have sworn I met Eva Mendes in Las Vegas. I believe she was working at Saphires. Yup .. I remember ... she said she loved me!
- Mean Creek :3: Truth or dare?
- The Jacket :3.5: How crazy is crazy, crazy?
- Harold and Kumar :5: Don't mess with WC!
- The Machinist :3.5: I think I'm hungry!
- Trauma :2: This really should be rated w/ a 1 ... but since Mena is in it w/ her cute little ta-tas ... 2 will do!
At the movies ...
- Batman Begins :5: A no brainer!
- Bewitched :-50: WARNING - DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE! THIS INCLUDES RENTING IT!
Sunday, June 26, 2005
Crave Case
If you haven't already, I highly recommend a slyder or two ... or thirty ... once every few years. For me, its been quite some time since I've visited the castle. Hopefully, I'll be thur soon enough.
Friday, June 17, 2005
CHECKMATE

After a few months playing JCHESS, I finally beat it! I'm pretty sure that it uses standard algorithms but still puts up a good fight. JCHESS is black, I'm white. Screenshot taken on Jan. 8, 2004. Me man ... me beat machine!!!
Thursday, June 16, 2005
"How do you make a computer blink?"
Was the 1997 match btw Kasparov and IBM's Deep Blue the greatest chess match of all time? I would like to think so. I watched "Game Over: Kasparov vs the Machine" last night. The fascinating documentry about Kasparov, IBM and the controversial events that took place during the 1997 chess match, reminds you that IBM is the ultimate corporate machine. "If you build it, they will come!" Immeditely after the defeat, IBM stock prices rose. Hmmmm! Where's Deep Blue now? So, if you're a chess player or simply interested in the fight of man vs machine, I recommend this film. Knight G1 to F3 ... your move!
FYI - In special features on the DVD, you can watch all the games btw Kasparov and Deep Blue. Truly fascinating.
Thursday, June 09, 2005
A Word Problem
At CU, 15% of the student body is colored. The annual expense for a resident student is $16,000 and for a non-resident, $34,000. Assume all colored students are residents. And the total annual expenses for all colored students is $64,000,000.
a.) How many students attend CU (approximately)?
b.) If 60% of the student body are residents, what is the total annual expense for the entire student body?
c.) What percentage of the total annual expense are colored students responsible for?
Thursday, June 02, 2005
Huh!?
George Orwell .. who?
Found in a 1945 British Socialist weekly, (The Tribune) a social critic, George Orwell, reacts to a letter by J. Stewart Cook who proposes a method to circumvent the perils of a “scientific hierarchy.” One of Cook’s proposals includes the recommendation that society, as a whole, should be scientifically educated. Although Orwell appears to agree with Cook’s statement, he shortly arrives at Cook’s implication on the meaning of science. Orwell describes Cook’s definition of science as studies of exact sciences that are performed in laboratories, which disregards other studies such as economics and sociology for example. Orwell suggests that the term science be based on rational thought and critical thinking in any course of study and not just a label for the exact sciences. Orwell supports his claim by providing a condition that the opinion of scientist (such as a chemist or a physicist) on moral and social issues be of more value to that of the opinions from an individual that was not provided the same training or education as received by a scientist. He enforces his statements by negating the idea that scientists are intellectually superior compared to other professionals. Additionally, Orwell introduces the comment that a person with training in the exact sciences, or even a master of a specific science, does not certify the scientist to encompass a “humane or skeptical outlook.” Spotlighting the physicists that contributed to the development of the atomic bomb, Orwell attempts to convince his readers that the scientists were merely carrying out their work and were not open minded to the overall affects of the device they were creating.
