Trim & Shift

Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true - Niels Bohr

Thursday, June 30, 2005

Ice Cream Farts

After renting my 8th movie this week at the buster, I headed over to Glacier Ice Cream for a milk shake. While placing my order with the young 20 something yo girl, I noticed that she had a smile from ear to ear. Either (1) she thought I was cute or (2) she was eyeing the zit on my upper lip or (3) she was having a good day and her smile had nothing to do with me. Either way, she made me smile. Moments after she finished making my shake, she says, "3.85 please!" I reach into my pocket for the loot then all of a sudden .... my ass decides to interrupt the moment! It wasn't incredibly loud but noticable. She chuckled and I immediately turred red. And just when I thought it couldn't get any worse, I smelt it! It was on! Semi-silent and definitely deadly. After I got my change, I beamed to my car. I couldn't of got out of there any faster than I did. Hopefully, next time I'll remember to clinch my cheeks. BTW ... the shake was great!

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

The List

Rating: 1 to 5 scale (5 = best, 1 = worst)

  1. Hitch :3: I thought Fresh Prince did a pretty good job considering the story line. I could have sworn I met Eva Mendes in Las Vegas. I believe she was working at Saphires. Yup .. I remember ... she said she loved me!
  2. Mean Creek :3: Truth or dare?
  3. The Jacket :3.5: How crazy is crazy, crazy?
  4. Harold and Kumar :5: Don't mess with WC!
  5. The Machinist :3.5: I think I'm hungry!
  6. Trauma :2: This really should be rated w/ a 1 ... but since Mena is in it w/ her cute little ta-tas ... 2 will do!

At the movies ...

  1. Batman Begins :5: A no brainer!
  2. Bewitched :-50: WARNING - DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE! THIS INCLUDES RENTING IT!

Sunday, June 26, 2005

Crave Case

Over the past 2 weeks, I've been a true Blockbuster slut, which is the result of no longer having cable TV .... ghetto!!! Of all the movies I watched, I truly enjoyed "Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle." During the movie, I became overwhelmed with nostalgia. I recall this one particular evening during Quest daze when we purchased 2 crave cases, a total of 60 slyders, from the Centereach WC. Bells were ringing in my head ... Hal-le-lujah, hal-le-lujah! I remember all the empty boxes moments after the cases entered my car. The sad part is ... I don't remember who I was with.

If you haven't already, I highly recommend a slyder or two ... or thirty ... once every few years. For me, its been quite some time since I've visited the castle. Hopefully, I'll be thur soon enough.

Friday, June 17, 2005

CHECKMATE



After a few months playing JCHESS, I finally beat it! I'm pretty sure that it uses standard algorithms but still puts up a good fight. JCHESS is black, I'm white. Screenshot taken on Jan. 8, 2004. Me man ... me beat machine!!!
Posted by Hello

Thursday, June 16, 2005

"How do you make a computer blink?"

Does anyone remember this ad posted around NYC in 1997? I surely don't! For me, 1997 was a prime party year and most of my time was spent at PURE (represent!). Who is the greatest chess player of all time? Many would vote for Kasparov. Others for Deep Blue. I vote for myself!

Was the 1997 match btw Kasparov and IBM's Deep Blue the greatest chess match of all time? I would like to think so. I watched "Game Over: Kasparov vs the Machine" last night. The fascinating documentry about Kasparov, IBM and the controversial events that took place during the 1997 chess match, reminds you that IBM is the ultimate corporate machine. "If you build it, they will come!" Immeditely after the defeat, IBM stock prices rose. Hmmmm! Where's Deep Blue now? So, if you're a chess player or simply interested in the fight of man vs machine, I recommend this film. Knight G1 to F3 ... your move!

FYI - In special features on the DVD, you can watch all the games btw Kasparov and Deep Blue. Truly fascinating.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

A Word Problem

Knowing my love for math, a peer in my "writing in science" class asked for assistance in solving a math problem from her practice GRE. At first, the problem seemed difficult to solve. Possibly because I was under the impression that the GRE is a very hard exam. And I'm sure it is! But this practice problem was easy as pi!!!

At CU, 15% of the student body is colored. The annual expense for a resident student is $16,000 and for a non-resident, $34,000. Assume all colored students are residents. And the total annual expenses for all colored students is $64,000,000.

a.) How many students attend CU (approximately)?
b.) If 60% of the student body are residents, what is the total annual expense for the entire student body?
c.) What percentage of the total annual expense are colored students responsible for?

Thursday, June 02, 2005

Huh!?

"After re-reading my own summary, it doesn't sound coherent. Big "F" for me! And wouldn't be the first! B-U-N-T, BUNT!

George Orwell .. who?

As a requirement for the school of engineering, we are required to take 3030 "Writing in Science." Although the title of the class sounds appealing, the work thus far is, in my opinion, lame. First assignment, summarize in 280 words or less George Orwell's essay on "What is science?" Today's class, to submit our summary and critique by classmates. I've posted mine if you wish to comment.

Found in a 1945 British Socialist weekly, (The Tribune) a social critic, George Orwell, reacts to a letter by J. Stewart Cook who proposes a method to circumvent the perils of a “scientific hierarchy.” One of Cook’s proposals includes the recommendation that society, as a whole, should be scientifically educated. Although Orwell appears to agree with Cook’s statement, he shortly arrives at Cook’s implication on the meaning of science. Orwell describes Cook’s definition of science as studies of exact sciences that are performed in laboratories, which disregards other studies such as economics and sociology for example. Orwell suggests that the term science be based on rational thought and critical thinking in any course of study and not just a label for the exact sciences. Orwell supports his claim by providing a condition that the opinion of scientist (such as a chemist or a physicist) on moral and social issues be of more value to that of the opinions from an individual that was not provided the same training or education as received by a scientist. He enforces his statements by negating the idea that scientists are intellectually superior compared to other professionals. Additionally, Orwell introduces the comment that a person with training in the exact sciences, or even a master of a specific science, does not certify the scientist to encompass a “humane or skeptical outlook.” Spotlighting the physicists that contributed to the development of the atomic bomb, Orwell attempts to convince his readers that the scientists were merely carrying out their work and were not open minded to the overall affects of the device they were creating.

You sound like you know what you're saying ...

Earlier today I had an interesting conversation with a peer. The topic of the conversation is irrelevant but what I found interesting was that the person felt very strongly about what was said ... as if the statement that was dished out was actually factual in nature. All I thought to myself was ... is it possible to be that naive. They're only opinions my friend, only opinions. Or did you read it online???