Trim & Shift

Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true - Niels Bohr

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Prove It

For my number theory class, we were assigned two problems on the first day. The problem that was most interesting was about prime numbers. A prime number is a number that is divisible by 1 AND itself. 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 ... are prime numbers. The problem is this ...

The consecutive odd numbers 3, 5 and 7 are all primes. Are there infinitely many such "prime triplets?" That is, are there infinitely many prime numbers, p, such that p+2 and p+4 are also primes?

The answer is NO! But how do you prove it??? Dema to the rescue. Here is his proof ...

For all p excluding the number 3.

(Fig 1.) <-----p---p+1---p+2---p+3---p+4---->
  1. Assume P is prime.
  2. Assume there exists infinitely number of prime triplets of the form S = {p, p+2, p+4}.
  3. Statement 2 implies that p+2 and p+4 are always prime for any prime number p..
  4. If p is not divisible by 3, then p+1 or p+2 must be divisible by 3.
  • Condition 1 - p is prime and p+1 is not divisible by 3 ... implies that p+2 is divisible by 3. Contradiction of statement 3.
  • Condition 2 - p is prime and p+1 is divisible by 3 ... implies that p+4 is divisable by 3. Contradiction of statement 3.

Therefore, each condition cannot exists to statify assumption number 2 and there cannot be an infinitely many "prime triplets." ... So you're saying I have a chance!!!